When I read the first post, I immediately think "Why not call it 1.5?"
As the others, I think 1.5 is a good choice. Nautile On 26 sep, 14:16, Nicolas Perriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Francois Zaninotto a écrit : > > > This leads me to a marketing concern: Should we call the next release > > "symfony 1.1" or "symfony 2.0"? > > I agree that 1.1 sounds a bit undernumbered regarding new features and > enhancements. As Firefox did, we could also think about a 1.5 version, > but definitely not a 1.1 to me. Also, as Fabien has began to communicate > around the 2.0 version (SymfonyCamp slides are circulating on the web), > naming actual 1.1 version 2.0 could confuse some minds. > > ++ > > -- > Nicolas Perriault http://www.clever-age.com > Clever Age - conseil en architecture technique > GSM: +33 6 60 92 08 67 Tél: +33 1 53 34 66 10 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
