2007/9/26, Jo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I don't see any reason not to call it symfony 1.1. > It is the next release and one (big) step ahead. > > Calling it symfony 1.5 or 2.0 I would wonder if > I've missed the last releases and what happend > between release 1.0 and 1.5 (or 2.0). > > Does symfony really need marketing by release > numbers?
+1. If we really want to do release marketing, then call it Symfony Millenium. Otherwise, keep a normal numbering scheme seems better to me. the linux kernel will not even go beyond 2.6 ... we want people to be attracted by framework's technical quality right ? a consistent numbering scheme is part of software component's quality 2 cents ++ tristan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
