Ian P. Christian wrote: > Kris Wallsmith wrote: > >> On the topic of what to call things, does anyone have an opinion on >> whether the sfUrchinPlugin is named incorrectly? Should it actually be >> called sfGoogleAnalyticsPlugin? >> >> > > Technically - I tihnk the sfUrchinPlugin is perhaps correct, as urchin > might still be a project of it's own. > > If this plugin is capable of supporting other JS based stats engines > though (Mint for example, there are plenty more) - hten perhaps it > should be renamed to sfJsStatsPlugin or something? > > > > > I see why not support more stats engines as all if does it put a <script> tag in the body of the page. Actually I do not see the purpose of a plugin just for that, but hey :)
Kupo --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
