Gunnar Lium wrote: > Will do, when I get the chance (not that I really complained, anyway). > But I believe it's legitimate to discuss quality of plugins and > organization of such, even if one may not be able to contribute.
I must admit, I'm on your side on this one. I do think it's important that plug ins are better organized, and rated. Hopefully symfony-force will solve his. Just because it's free, itdoesn't mean you shouldn't expect some kind of quality from it - symfony itself is after all free! It would be really useful to see things like comments and ratings for a plugin, along with who maintains it , and perhaps a list of sites using each plugin. > http://www.symfony-forge.org/ is probably a good idea, but unless I'm > missing something, this is basically just a list of plugins, with moslty > dead wiki-pages, with the option to rate them. No indication about > quality, stable/beta/alpha, official. And furthermore, this site is not > linked to from the symfony-project.org-plugin page, which is the natural > place to look for plugin information. So I choose to uphold my argument. I believe it will be the 'offical' plugin place at some point. Jon Wage - your input please :) -- Ian P. Christian ~ http://pookey.co.uk --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
