On 07/12/2007, Loïc Vernet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you not satidfied with the quality of a plugin, feel free to > contribute. :) > Will do, when I get the chance (not that I really complained, anyway). But I believe it's legitimate to discuss quality of plugins and organization of such, even if one may not be able to contribute. The fact that plugin developers mostly works for free, doesn't really help someone looking for a professional framework, in part judging by the availability and quality of plugins. By be being clear about which plugins are production ready, and which are under heavy development, we lose nothing, but may gain happy users
> That's a fantastic idea, I 'm not sure why someone hasn't thought about > > this before. > > > >*cough* http://www.symfony-forge.org/ *cough* ;) > http://www.symfony-forge.org/ is probably a good idea, but unless I'm missing something, this is basically just a list of plugins, with moslty dead wiki-pages, with the option to rate them. No indication about quality, stable/beta/alpha, official. And furthermore, this site is not linked to from the symfony-project.org-plugin page, which is the natural place to look for plugin information. So I choose to uphold my argument. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
