It is indeed odd, but I think having a way to build plugins which work
regardless of the ORM you use would be a very nice feature. Whether or not
that is even possible is debatable still.
Francois, the thing about what I suggested above is you can continue
developing the Propel functionality, but you can develop it in a way so that
we can have this sf{ORM}Finder interface available to be extend to things
other than Propel.
I am going to code up my ideas and I'll let you know how it goes. I am 100%
confident I can modify the code a little bit to implement an interface, and
have sfPropelFinder and sfDoctrineFinder implement this common interface. We
would then have to discuss how we can create an abstraction for interacting
with the ORM models.
- Jon
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 3:38 AM, Tristan Rivoallan <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Mark Ng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 27/03/2008, Jonathan Wage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I think this is the first step in creating a ORM abstraction layer.
> As I
> >
> > Am I the only one that finds the idea of creating an abstraction layer
> > abstraction layer (or meta-abstraction layer) a little bit odd ?
>
> you are not the only one ;)
>
> ++
> tristan
>
> --
> Tristan Rivoallan
> http://www.clever-age.com
> Clever Age - conseil en architecture technique
> GSM: +33 6 219 219 33 Tél: +33 1 53 34 66 10
>
> >
>
--
Jonathan Wage
http://www.jwage.com
http://www.centresource.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"symfony developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
