Hey there, I was just surfing on the Symfony Cookbook for sf1.1, and I finally realized that the articles posted where not all "sf1.1 compliant" (for example, the "how to upload a file" doesn't seem to deal a lot with sfForm ...). Maybe I'm just a nerd but I think this is quite dangerous to put outdated documentation like this on the sf website *even if it is clearly and loudly said that this is WIP*. Shouldn't we tag those outdated articles and howto as "needing to be updated" ? I think the current way articles are posted can be dangerously disappointing for any user who would like to deal with sf1.1 (moreover, this kind of "need to be updated" indication could help in motivating people to update the documentation).
Am I wrong ? Taku ps : sorry for my poor english --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
