Great thing ! Note : this remark wasn't a critic and I hope it hasn't been taken as a critic, the work made by the doc team and the whole community is just truely awesome. Guys, you're my heroes.
Taku 2008/6/9 Fabien Potencier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > This chapter of the cookbook will be updated tomorrow. > > Fabien > > -- > Fabien Potencier > Sensio CEO - symfony lead developer > sensiolabs.com | symfony-project.com | aide-de-camp.org > Tél: +33 1 40 99 80 80 > > > Nicolas Garnault wrote: > > Hey there, > > > > I was just surfing on the Symfony Cookbook for sf1.1, and I finally > > realized that the articles posted where not all "sf1.1 compliant" (for > > example, the "how to upload a file" doesn't seem to deal a lot with > > sfForm ...). > > Maybe I'm just a nerd but I think this is quite dangerous to put > > outdated documentation like this on the sf website *even if it is > > clearly and loudly said that this is WIP*. > > Shouldn't we tag those outdated articles and howto as "needing to be > > updated" ? I think the current way articles are posted can be > > dangerously disappointing for any user who would like to deal with sf1.1 > > (moreover, this kind of "need to be updated" indication could help in > > motivating people to update the documentation). > > > > Am I wrong ? > > > > Taku > > > > ps : sorry for my poor english > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
