To be honest we started from the old sfPHPUnitPlugin ( http://raw.trac.symfony-project.org/browser/plugins/sfPHPUnitPlugin/branches/1.0 ) and improved things to be more customizable. If you look at the source you would notice that it use lime like decorator so it would be pretty easy to add xml support for ant build or other things!
Event the test results as similar to lime so those who are familiar with it wont be lost! On Sep 23, 8:51 am, "Tristan Rivoallan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 2:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But if PHPUnit could get citizenship or replace lime in future that > > would be the best thing that could happen to symfony testing. :) We > > had a talk here last month we couldn't figure out why symfony went > > with their own test framework instead of integrating phpunit(maybe > > fabian of someone from sensio could hint me about on that) since > > phpunit is at least 20x more powerful with all the extension > > available. > > couldn't agree more. > does your upcoming sfPhpUnitPlugin provides a lime decorator so that > we can get phpunit xml compatible output ? This would pave the way for > a migration to phpunit, and would make it possible to start building a > continuous integration infrastructure for symfony. > > ++ > tristan > > -- > Tristan Rivoallanhttp://www.clever-age.com > Clever Age - conseil en architecture technique > GSM: +33 6 219 219 33 Tél: +33 1 53 34 66 10 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
