frédéric gontier wrote:
> I love this framework too and in production mode i use only 1.0 version.
> I'm really afraid that Symfony could not be the success that it
> deserves.
> why? because backward compatibility is not supported with different
> version of the framework, critic behavior's interface like email or
> configuration are changed on every version. Maybe, it would be safe to
> slow the releases and trace a stable roadmap for a LTS version.
> I think that this discussion is really critic, so i hope that someone
> like fabien would react.

I have just answered to the original email.

Fabien

> 
> Le mercredi 28 octobre 2009 à 17:23 -0400, Tom Boutell a écrit :
>  > I understand that support for Symfony 1.2 is supposed to end in
>  > November with the release of Symfony 1.3.
>  >
>  > What practices, if any, in Symfony 1.2 code are expected to be
>  > incompatible with Symfony 1.3?
>  >
>  > I know Symfony 1.3 won't be the huge change that Symfony 1.1/1.2 were.
>  > But I still don't think it's wise to drop support for practices
>  > considered valid in 1.2 the moment 1.3 appears.
>  >
>  > Other long-established open source projects do not do this on such a
>  > scale. Valid PHP 5.0.x code runs on PHP 5.3.x, with deprecation
>  > warnings sometimes, but it runs. And 5.2.x is definitely still being
>  > actively supported after the release of 5.3.x.
>  >
>  > It is very difficult to make responsible proposals to clients without
>  > ongoing support for at least the previous minor version series for
>  > Symfony.
>  >
>  > I know Symfony 1.2 wasn't supposed to be an LTS release but the
>  > reality is that it was the first stable-enough-to-use release of
>  > Symfony since the end of the 1.0.x series, and people have migrated
>  > long term projects to it out of necessity. I strongly feel it should
>  > be supported for at least a year after the release of 1.3.
>  >
>  > I also think it is appropriate to fix serious bugs like
>  > http://trac.symfony-project.org/ticket/6937 in the 1.2 series, making
>  > features work substantially as advertised unless the only possible fix
>  > is a backwards incompatible change. But I can live without embedded
>  > M2M relation forms ever working in 1.2. What I find difficult to live
>  > without is enough stability that the Symfony releases page doesn't
>  > frighten clients off.
>  >
>  > BC breaks in a mature system should be a major-version thing (2.0, not
>  > 1.0), and there should be ongoing support of the previous major
>  > version for quite a while when they happen.
>  >
>  > I love this framework - please help me sell it to my clients as
>  > something that will continue to work for at least a year. (:
>  >
> 
> > 


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"symfony developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to