Nicolas Perriault wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Crafty_Shadow <[email protected]> wrote: > >> bug I came across (#7713) [...] but so was (#7693) > > Hmm, looks like you're using Propel, right? ;) > > I've been running some websites using 1.3 + doctrine 1.2 for some > weeks now and found no big problem so far. I find it really stable, > and to be honnest, more stable than, say, the 1.1 at the time it was > released as stable (and I might be one of the culprit, let me admit it > ;)). >
At Sensio, we have been using symfony 1.3 for all new projects since the beginning of September (with Doctrine) and everything works fine. The symfony website itself has been migrated to symfony 1.3 some weeks ago, and it uses Propel. Fabien > So aren't your questions rather "is Propel 1.4 integration stable > enough to be bundled and released with symfony 1.3 and 1.4 in the > upcoming days? and if it's not, shouldn't we postpone its integration, > or delay the release of a LTS symfony release which will bundle it?"? > I'm no more using Propel, so I might talking about something I have > absolutely no clue about, but seeing the bugs in trac related to it > I'd +1 the postponing option for some weeks in both cases :/ > > François, any though or feedback? What do the others think? > > ++ > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en.
