On 23.09.2010, at 15:26, Yuen-Chi Lian wrote: > Hi Loïc, > > +1 for Annotation based DIC setup. :) But of course it can't be a runtime > thing, so it will be a Dumper's job to address these annotations. Let me know > if am wrong.
remember that annotations only solve the question of what the dependencies are on a high level. aka you would define the names of the services and parameters. defining actual class names, let alone parameter values, imho makes little sense and is taking annotations in the wrong direction. > Can you give some elaboration on the idea of overloading annotation config in > a config file? of course one can always dump the annotations to yaml, but code that defines annotations, which are totally overwritten via yaml would be confusing. regards, Lukas Kahwe Smith [email protected] -- If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to security at symfony-project.com You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
