2011/1/20 Jordi Boggiano <[email protected]>: > I agree in principle, but imagine the template includes and stuff if > you'd have the full namespace: > > {% extends "Vendor\Bundle\BlogBundle:Foo:index.php.html" %}
I know. But if we go the other way, we have to write Vendor\Bundle\VendorBlogBundle\... in every other place where we have to fully qualify a namespace in our application. That's ugly as well. > Fabien: I still fail to see the reason why you want the bundle > namespace to be called BlogBundle, it's already in the Bundle > category, and the class name also identifies it as a bundle. We had this discussion before. The decision AFAIR was to make class and namespace names as short as possible, but not short enough for them to lose their meaning. (e.g., "Blog" is too short, "BlogBundle" is sufficiently descriptive, "VendorBlogBundle" is overkill IMO). Bernhard -- Software Architect & Engineer Blog: http://webmozarts.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/webmozart -- If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to security at symfony-project.com You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
