On 17.02.2011 13:41, Johannes Schmitt wrote: > Well, are we writing a logger library just because of the unused > components or because ZF logger has some deficiencies? If it's just to > get rid of the other components, then there are certainly better > approaches... but I admit that might not be as interesting as writing an > own logger library :)
Take it easy people :) I just felt like writing some fun stuff yesterday, thought that was a good occasion to get rid of ZF at the same time. Sure Symfony follows the same model for the time being, but I use Symfony so I don't mind having a Symfony checkout. I mind having ZF in Symfony though. You don't have to agree, if you don't, keep ZF in core, I'll make a MonologBundle and those interested can delete ZF and use that instead. As for Zend\Logger, there are no real deficiencies I suppose. I just don't think ZF is too good at KISS. There's tons of code in there that imo is not necessary. They've kept most of their ZF1 code too instead of scrapping everything, which means they still have legacy stuff that grew historically and may not make sense if you write from scratch. It's just my point of view though. Cheers -- Jordi Boggiano @seldaek :: http://seld.be/ -- If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to security at symfony-project.com You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
