On 08.03.2011, at 14:10, Johannes Schmitt wrote: > I think we just need to have a clear definition of what goes into the > "Standard" edition. I can understand the feeling of the previous posters that > it feels kind of arbitrary at the moment.
exactly. like i said, i do not have a fundamental issue with annotations especially since they are available all over the place already anyway. i do think there is a risk that showing users the annotation shorts cuts in frameworkextrabundle too early there is a bit of a risk. contrary to doctrine its not equivalent if the template is auto guessed or even configured in an annotation. in one case i would need to use a different configuration format and in the other one i would need to write explicit php code. so i agree with ryan that in the first few controllers we show a user they should use more explicit code (heck even the Controller base class is clearer). core.view is a magic edge case and not the norm, we are still in agreement on that? regards, Lukas Kahwe Smith [email protected] -- If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to security at symfony-project.com You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
