I feel the suffix of `Bundle` is important to differentiate between `Bundles`, `Compontents` and `Bridges`. In general I feel it's more natural to have a naming schema that is comparable with the file path. The few extra characters don't mind me and make everything a lot more explicit.
+1 for adding it back Marijn On Mar 30, 2:46 pm, Christophe COEVOET <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 30/03/2011 14:43, Albert Jessurum a �crit :> On Wednesday, March 30, > 2011 2:24:38 PM UTC+2, beberlei wrote: > > > Your namespace does not have to contain the Bundle name, it could be: > > > Acme\Foo\Entity\Bar > > Acme\Foo\Entity\BarRepository > > > The "Bundle" prefix is completly unnecessary there. > > > It has to be there in the namespace, if we adhere to the PSR-0 > > standard, as the folder name still contains the Bundle suffix (and > > that won't be changed, and I'm fine with that): > >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/symfony-devs/l4Cqr35cxK4/DG4L0ke9H7IJ > > PSR-0 says that the folder name has to match the namespace. So when he > suggested to change the namespace it implies renaming the folder. > > -- > Christophe | Stof -- If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to security at symfony-project.com You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
