Matthias Nothhaft wrote: > Kiril Angov wrote: >> I am also interested in the same as I read an article by person who got >> Propel 1.3 beta to work with symfony and compared the performance of >> 1.2, 1.3 and current Doctrine and it turned out 1.3 is faster than Doctrine. > > We should be careful with such statements.
Also I think that Propel and Doctrine have a very different philosophie behind them. DQL is very different than anything else. It has advantages and disadvantages. The key question is how big the differences are in the real world. How big the productivity differences are etc. Also both are still in development. For example AFAIk Propel 1.3 has some SQL caching now, that Doctrine recently also got etc. Finally to me the job of an ORM is the speed up development dramatically without slowing things down all too much. However specific bottleneck queries are probably still better left to hand optimization. regards, Lukas --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony users" group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
