James,

On Feb 8, 2008 1:58 AM, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Piere,
>
> Please read his email before telling me what the community has decided
> for the community.  I understand that for community plugins you should
> always use the sf prefix.  He's not talking about a community plugin,
> he's taking about a proprietary plugin for an API that you have to
> have a licensing agreement for.

I read his post and I don't see why it should be any different.

> While he could go ahead and use
> sfSomePlugin he doesn't have too.  He's looking advice,  If it's not a
> requirement from an Symfony API standard to use another prefix he
> doesn't have too.  I gave him a methodology that is commonly used with
> libraries/plugins.  You may think it's "über painful" but it's not. It
> helps keep name space sane.

It may be the counter part, making it rather insane.

What is common is to use a prefix, always, we agree on that at least :)

-- 
Pierre
http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"symfony users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to