Eno wrote: > On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, James wrote: > >> This is why I pay $150/month for a private server. > > Ive had various colocated private servers for years but switched to > virtual servers about a year ago (less stress over hardware :-) > >
Well there are hosts out there that dont run like that. For example MediaTemple gives you shell access and the ability to make virtual hosts in a container dir with the web root underneath that directory so you just: mkdir mydomain.name mydomain.name/sfproject sync to the sfproject folder and then cd mydomain.name ln -s html sfproject/web likewise DreamHost (i know - not reliable) allows you to make virtual hosts from the controlpanel which you can map to specific sub dirs under user homes, effectively setting things up just like you have made a virtual host on a virtual or dedicated box - so you dont even have to bother with symlinking or altering the sf file structure to accommodate. Now this requirement limits your pool of potential hosts but I'm sure there are others that give you similar abillites so its definitely more than 2. -- Ant Cunningham Graphic Designer | Web Developer Vector Based Design --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
