I'm not even talking colo, colo is such a pain. Why pay for a machine that's just going to degrade with time. Rent a server, 3 years later upgrade and get a better deal on a better machine.
James On Sep 19, 2008, at 12:08 AM, Eno wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Ant Cunningham wrote: > >> Well there are hosts out there that dont run like that. For example >> MediaTemple gives you shell access and the ability to make virtual >> hosts >> in a container dir with the web root underneath that directory so >> you just: >> >> mkdir mydomain.name mydomain.name/sfproject >> >> sync to the sfproject folder and then >> >> cd mydomain.name >> ln -s html sfproject/web >> >> likewise DreamHost (i know - not reliable) allows you to make virtual >> hosts from the controlpanel which you can map to specific sub dirs >> under >> user homes, effectively setting things up just like you have made a >> virtual host on a virtual or dedicated box - so you dont even have to >> bother with symlinking or altering the sf file structure to >> accommodate. > > > Yeah, but if you have your own colo, dedicated or virtual server, > you can > organize your vhosts in whatever fashion you like... :-) > > > > -- > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
