Hi guys,

For those interested in the sfPaymentPlugin, please now check on :
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-payment-developers/browse_thread/thread/f11e33cfdbc7bc46

Antoine
http://letscod.com

On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Marijn <[email protected]>wrote:

>
>
>
> On Jul 12, 2:25 am, Gandalf <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Thats great! I checked github repository and found it empty. I really
> > like your approach sounds very similar to what I have, I wat to see
> > and see if my code is up to plugin standards!!!
>
> Hi Pablo,
>
> Check out my branch in the SVN Repo. There is a very minor proprtion
> of my code there.
>
> - Marijn
>
> >
> > All best,
> >
> > Pablo
> >
> > On 7/10/09, Marijn <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Jul 9, 11:56 pm, Gandalf <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> Hello,
> >
> > >> Whats the status, a lot of noise and .....??
> >
> > >> -Pablo
> >
> > > Hi Pablo, I'm currently still in the process of splitting my old code
> > > into this plugin. This isn't the only item in my agenda, hence it's
> > > moving a bit slow. Anyway, I'm hoping to finish of some stuff by the
> > > end of next week.
> >
> > > - Marijn
> >
> > >> On 6/29/09, Marijn <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >> > I just put some of my code in the 1.2-marijn branch. I've got some
> > >> > splitting out to do as most of it is related to the actual
> > >> > implementation of the service provider that I use. I guess I need to
> > >> > create a repo for that as well...
> >
> > >> > I'll post some of my thoughts on github later on this week.
> >
> > >> > On Jun 29, 11:31 pm, Marijn <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> >> On Jun 29, 8:44 am, Antoine Leclercq <[email protected]>
> > >> >> wrote:
> >
> > >> >> > Hi,
> > >> >> > @Marijn :
> > >> >> >  - I gave you access to the plugin repository. Tell me if it
> works
> > >> >> > for
> > >> >> > you.
> >
> > >> >> It's working. I just pushed a commit with the basic repo layout and
> > >> >> plugin structure. If I find the time later on this week I'll create
> a
> > >> >> branch for myself and commit my current code.
> >
> > >> >> >  - About GitHub, it allows a more visual approach than symfony
> trac,
> > >> >> > bugs
> > >> >> > (issues) can be referenced and managed in a better way
> > >> >> > (http://github.com/letscod/sfPaymentPlugin/issues) and the
> community
> > >> >> > aspect
> > >> >> > is really present throughout the dev process (rating, stats,
> > >> >> > watchers...) so
> > >> >> > I think we should have a go. We'll check in a few weeks how it's
> > >> >> > going.
> > >> >> > As
> > >> >> > long as we refer explicitly on symfony's wiki that we use
> GitHub... I
> > >> >> > don't
> > >> >> > see any problem.
> >
> > >> >> > About the standard interface for payment, I am reviewing payment
> > >> >> > methods
> > >> >> > in
> > >> >> > different languages and I think we should get some inspiration
> from
> > >> >> > successful solutions. I still need some time to dig, but if you
> are
> > >> >> > using
> > >> >> > any smart and flexible online solution, feel free to share it.
> >
> > >> >> > Regards,
> >
> > >> >> > Antoine
> > >> >> > LetsCod
> >
> > >> >> > On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Marijn
> > >> >> > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> > >> >> > > On Jun 26, 5:08 pm, Antoine Leclercq <
> [email protected]>
> > >> >> > > wrote:
> > >> >> > > > Alright,
> >
> > >> >> > > > I'm preparing the project tools so that we can start working
> > >> >> > > > together and
> > >> >> > > > continue discussing in a more structured way.
> > >> >> > > > You'll find a new plugin (hopefully it won't be another empty
> > >> >> > > > shell)
> > >> >> > > > on
> > >> >> > > >  *http://www.symfony-project.org/plugins/sfPaymentPlugin
> >
> > >> >> > > Could you provide me with access to it? I would love to create
> a
> > >> >> > > branch of my existing code and send it out there.
> >
> > >> >> > > > The GitHub page is available on
> > >> >> > > >  *http://wiki.github.com/letscod/sfPaymentPlugin
> >
> > >> >> > > As much as I love github shouldn't we keep it in the trac wiki.
> > >> >> > > That
> > >> >> > > will also ease the process of filing bugs and referencing to
> wiki
> > >> >> > > entries...
> >
> > >> >> > > > Following this thread, I think it's pretty obvious that we
> have
> > >> >> > > > to
> > >> >> > > > start
> > >> >> > > > building an interface class as well as a dispatcher class (as
> > >> >> > > > @Lee
> > >> >> > > > suggested). I think they can be both located in a single
> plugin
> > >> >> > > > sfPaymentPlugin.
> > >> >> > > > The specific processing needed by the various payment options
> > >> >> > > > will
> > >> >> > > > then
> > >> >> > > be
> > >> >> > > > taken care of in individual plugins (sfPaymentPayPalPlugin,
> > >> >> > > > sfPaymentAmazonPlugin, sfPaymentGoogleCheckoutPlugin,
> > >> >> > > > sfPaymentPayboxPlugin...) in which the main class will be
> > >> >> > > > implementing
> > >> >> > > the
> > >> >> > > > interface defined earlier.
> >
> > >> >> > > I currently use a very generic interface for that. The problem
> is
> > >> >> > > that
> > >> >> > > not all payment providers have a similar transaction process.
> >
> > >> >> > > > IMHO, if we want to strengthen the payment solution on
> Symfony,
> > >> >> > > > and
> > >> >> > > > eventually start developing a open source online shop
> solution
> > >> >> > > > (that
> > >> >> > > > was
> > >> >> > > my
> > >> >> > > > dream this morning), existing payment plugins (i.e.
> > >> >> > > > sfAtosPaymentPlugin,
> > >> >> > > > sfPaymentSIPSPlugin) should be reviewed and updated to work
> using
> > >> >> > > > the
> > >> >> > > same
> > >> >> > > > system, therefore we can define a standard for online payment
> > >> >> > > > under
> > >> >> > > Symfony,
> > >> >> > > > but this might well get pretty unmanageable... I haven't had
> time
> > >> >> > > > yet to
> > >> >> > > > review them in detail... +1 item to todo list.
> >
> > >> >> > > > Regards,
> >
> > >> >> > > > Antoine
> > >> >> > > > LetsCod
> >
> > >> >> > > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 3:45 AM, [email protected]
> > >> >> > > > <[email protected]
> > >> >> > > >wrote:
> >
> > >> >> > > > > I think Simon Cast has a point,
> > >> >> > > > > a)Paypalis crucial, but Amazon Payments is building
> traction,
> > >> >> > > > > (it’s
> > >> >> > > > > a solid affordable solution for many vendors)
> > >> >> > > > > b) Support reoccuring payments. [I am thinking through the
> > >> >> > > > > adapter
> > >> >> > > > > pattern as each provider that supports it will have a
> different
> > >> >> > > > > implementation.
> >
> > >> >> > > > > I would like to contribute to this project, [Just not as
> the
> > >> >> > > > > lead,
> > >> >> > > > > as
> > >> >> > > > > I don't have the dedication at the mo] But I could
> definitely
> > >> >> > > > > contribute as I have some good ecomm experience, and
> symfony
> > >> >> > > > > really
> > >> >> > > > > needs this (as it can boast about so much other stuff at
> the
> > >> >> > > > > moment)
> >
> > >> >> > > > > Be sure to sign me up when this project gets kicked off.
> >
> > >> >> > > > > On Jun 24, 5:48 pm, Marijn <[email protected]>
> > >> >> > > > > wrote:
> > >> >> > > > > > On Jun 19, 7:43 am, Antoine Leclercq
> > >> >> > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > >> >> > > > > > wrote:
> >
> > >> >> > > > > > > Hi back,
> > >> >> > > > > > > Alright, I'm back to Beirut and ready for real stuff.
> > >> >> > > > > > > Symfony
> > >> >> > > > > > > Live
> > >> >> > > > > > > conferences were awesome and there were lots of nice
> level
> > >> >> > > > > > > talks.
> >
> > >> >> > > > > > > @Marijn : Nice approach. We'll definitely go for wider
> > >> >> > > > > > > solution in
> > >> >> > > > > order to
> > >> >> > > > > > > provide a standard way to process transactions. I need
> to
> > >> >> > > > > > > dig
> > >> >> > > > > > > a bit
> > >> >> > > > > more on
> > >> >> > > > > > > existing online payment solution before starting,
> hopefully
> > >> >> > > > > > > next
> > >> >> > > week.
> > >> >> > > > > Let
> > >> >> > > > > > > me know when you publish your code. It could be a
> start.
> >
> > >> >> > > > > > I just returned from my holiday and have a ton of things
> to
> > >> >> > > > > > do.
> > >> >> > > > > > I
> > >> >> > > > > > guess this will take a little longer but maybe I'll just
> put
> > >> >> > > > > > the
> > >> >> > > > > > current stuff online as is. Send me a message if you're
> > >> >> > > > > > interested in
> > >> >> > > > > > having a look.
> >
> > >> >> > > > > > > @AJStoneham : That's exactly what we are trying to do.
> I
> > >> >> > > > > > > think
> > >> >> > > > > > > we
> > >> >> > > all
> > >> >> > > > > had
> > >> >> > > > > > > the same feeling when trying to find a decent online
> > >> >> > > > > > > payment
> > >> >> > > solution
> > >> >> > > > > for
> > >> >> > > > > > > Symfony...
> >
> > >> >> > > > > > > Alright, if we want to move to a solid, active and
> > >> >> > > > > > > maintainable
> > >> >> > > > > development,
> > >> >> > > > > > > I suggest we follow these practices :
> > >> >> > > > > > >  - Public Roadmap
> > >> >> > > > > > >  - Repository hosted properly (github.com seems a good
> > >> >> > > > > > > solution
> > >> >> > > for
> > >> >> > > > > open
> > >> >> > > > > > > source projects)
> > >> >> > > > > > >  - Unit and functional tests OK on every commit (use
> sismo
> > >> >> > > > > > > when
> > >> >> > > > > available,
> > >> >> > > > > > > integrate doc-test?)
> > >> >> > > > > > >   - Updated documentation
> >
> > >> >> > > > > > > I'll take some more documentation on online payment
> methods
> > >> >> > > > > > > and
> > >> >> > > > > existing
> > >> >> > > > > > > solutions certainly next week.
> > >> >> > > > > > > Feel free to share links or snippets of code here.
> >
> > >> >> > > > > > > See you guys later,
> >
> > >> >> > > > > > > Antoine
> >
> > >> >> > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Marijn <
> > >> >> > > [email protected]
> > >> >> > > > > >wrote:
> >
> > >> >> > > > > > > > On Jun 10, 4:47 pm, AJStoneham <[email protected]>
> > >> >> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> >> > > > > > > > > PS, sounds like your using the wrong wheel for api
> > >> >> > > > > > > > > requests.
> > >> >> > > ;-)
> >
> > >> >> > > > > > > > What wheel do you suggest?
> >
> > >> >> > > > > > > > > On Jun 9, 3:25 pm, Marijn
> > >> >> > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > >> >> > > wrote:
> >
> > >> >> > > > > > > > > > P.s. it makes use of sfWebBrowserPlugin to
> prevent
> > >> >> > > reinventing
> > >> >> > > > > the
> > >> >> > > > > > > > > > wheel for api requests but it can be injected
> with
> > >> >> > > > > > > > > > any
> > >> >> > > > > > > > > > object
> > >> >> > > > > that
> > >> >> > > > > > > > > > implements a sfWebBrowserInterface
> >
> > >> >> > > > > > > > > > On Jun 10, 12:23 am, Marijn
> > >> >> > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > >> >> > > > > wrote:
> >
> > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > Hi everybody,
> >
> > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > I currently have a private plugin
> >
> > ...
> >
> > read more »
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"symfony users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to