Issue 1196: improve our examples http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1196
Comment #11 by andy.terrel: Thanks for the docstrings! I signed off all of them. Okay I updated the patches (removed the all script made beginner/expansion.py work correctly) and made some improvements to the vandermonde example, which was giving the wrong result. I might have made the example a bit more complicated than I needed to, but I'll go ahead and throw it out there to see what people think. Another thing we should probably do is separate the examples that require windowing from the others and possibly add running the non-windowed native sympy examples to the tests. Also I had to delete and readd my branch on the repo, I'm not sure if that is how things are suppose to work but it I didn't know how to rebase the remote guy. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-issues" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-issues?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
