Comment #3 on issue 2626 by [email protected]: Piecewise should use a
different syntax for "otherwise"
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626
AFAIK we choose Mathematica's syntax
I suggested a default keyword but it wasn't implemented.
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=353#c17
The problem with (expr, 1>0) will always be a problem by the definition of
a Piecewise function. The (expr, True) will give a default no matter what
so it is indeed the keyword that is the redundancy.
Not sure what you mean by "mathematical", tuple are as "mathematical" as
any container. Furthermore the tuples are only in the user level, the
internal code has a different representation.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-issues?hl=en.
