I wonder if we could do this through the wiki somehow. Aaron Meure
On Feb 18, 2011, at 11:51 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote: > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Felix Kaiser <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 02/18/2011 03:39 PM, Chris Smith wrote: >>> >>> Vinzent Steinberg wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Anyone else have ideas along this line? >>>>> >>>>> I think it would make sense to create a directory in sympy for such >>>>> stuff. "sympy/utilities" comes to my mind, but maybe it is already >>>>> overloaded. Maybe "sympy/addons"? >>>>> >>>>> If people start using it a lot, it can be moved to the core. >>>>> >>> Maybe it could be >>> >>> sympy >>> addons >>> vks >>> smichr >>> asmeurer >>> >>> etc... Since different people might write routines with the same name and >>> so namespace could keep these sorted. >>> >>> /c >>> >> The idea itself is definitely good, but those snippets would probably be >> untested and unreviewed (if they were tested and reviewed, there would be no >> reason not to add them directly into sympy). Do we really want such code in >> the main repo? Maybe we should create a sympy-snippets repo instead? > > Exactly. I think it doesn't belong to the main repo. I understand > Chris' point though, and I think the solution is to get it into sympy > proper, and I will reply in the other thread about this. > > Ondrej > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
