On Mar 24, 12:22 am, Ondrej Certik <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:42 PM, weralwolf <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 23 Бер, 21:48, Ondrej Certik <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:04 AM, weralwolf <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Hello, where my simple example of calculations corrections due to > >> > perturbation theory for hole with infinite walls. I thinks I didn't > >> > use all SymPy features, so if it possible guide me. > >> > Source:http://pygments.org/demo/16998/ > > >> Nice! I ran your script, and got a number: > > >> -0.281647771314390 > > >> Then I printed E_n(_n, _a, _mass).n() and I got: > > >> 0.197392088021787 > > >> so the 0.197... is the original energy, and -0.281... is the corrected one? > > > Yes, you are right, it's exactly what I mean in script. > > How hard would it be to do more perturbation terms, so that we can see > some kind of convergence in the energies? People don't do that by > hand, because it is tedious, but with sympy, it might be possible. > That'd be really cool. > > > > >> Indeed, I agree with your conclusions, it'd be really cool to make > >> this work with brakets. > > > It should be really shorter and simply. Can you guide me to get > > application for this idea? > > Definitely. Go to the wiki: > > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Gsoc-current-applications > > and start crafting it up, then ask for feedback, and I and other > people will try to help. > > Ondrej
So, I went there and create draft of my application: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Perturbation-theory-by-Anatolii-Koval . Will be very appreciative to hear some fixes or proposals about it. Also I will write more information little bit later. Anatolii -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
