Le jeudi 28 avril 2011 à 20:54 -0700, Ondrej Certik a écrit : > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Chris Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > We have pretty printing and latex output because we need ways to more > > clearly see the information that we generate. The TableForm seems to be an > > addition in this spirit. In the input/process/output scheme, it is part of > > the output. > > > > One thing you could ask is if you installed python and sympy on a new > > machine without your own tools for manipulating data, would you be wishing > > for the TableForm or not? The ability to clearly communicate data to the > > user from within sympy seems like it would be a good idea. > > > > I lean toward +1. The OEIS was removed (by me on the basis of Aaron's +1) > > before I even got to see how it worked. How did it work? > The complete code was:
import webbrowser _oeis_url = 'http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/?q=' def oeis(seq, tab=True): """The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences. """ url = _oeis_url + ','.join(map(str, seq)) if tab: webbrowser.open_new_tab(url) else: webbrowser.open_new(url) > The OEIS was apparently removed even though Mateusz quite clearly said > he is against, see this issue: > > http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2303 > Well, it was added even though I clearly said I was against it as soon as I saw it. > Btw, the "revert" pull request is here: > > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/257 > > which doesn't say any explanation why and the issue referenced in > there is wrong. It took me quite some time to figure out, that the > relevant issue is #2303. Yes, I messed up the issue number and the link! I got it right from the other side though. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
