On 2 Mai, 16:46, Haz <[email protected]> wrote: > Tom: Apologies, but I'm having trouble inferring what you github username is > -- where is the branch? >
Oh I'm sorry … it's ness01. Branch is at https://github.com/ness01/sympy/tree/local_assump > Fredrik: I like the idea, but that seems like a massive shift in the SymPy > core that I don't feel is possible in the time frame that the assumptions > need to be fixed in. > > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 3:30 AM, Tom Bachmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > Alright, so I took Vinzent's old branch and made the most important > > things work over current master - see my local_assump branch [*]. I > > also added the hashing extensions for caching I described. Now only > > someone has to be daring enough to rewrite all the .is_foo properties > > and see how much breaks. > > > [*] There are a few test failures, but nothing unfixable. > > > @Haz: Can you take a look if this implementation of caching is still > > amenable to the problems you described? There is a test in > > test_cache.py that you could take as a baseline. > > > Even if we decide that assumptions should all be passed around > > explicitely, I think assumption injection is a good transition > > strategy. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "sympy" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
