On 03.05.2011 21:47, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Fredrik Johansson
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Tom Bachmann<[email protected]> wrote:
Actually how does this relate to the following wiki page:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Algebras-in-SymPyCore
It's roughly the same thing.
I also think that what Fredrik says might be a good idea. I don't have
much experience with this to have a clear opinion though. The reason I
have just used Add/Mul/Pow classes for everything in SymPy (long time
ago) is that it is conceptually a super simple idea, and it got us
very far. E.g. from the Zen of Python:
1) Simple is better than complex (Add/Mul/Pow is simpler than all the
algebras+other machinery)
2) Complex is better than complicated (the algebras are probably
better than the complicated entangled assumptions+cache)
As such, I now that we can get very fast just with Add/Mul/Pow (see
the csympy code: https://github.com/certik/csympy), and when using
Refine() and other things, we should be able to have core not using
assumptions nor cache, be fast, and using the new assumptions in
refine(). That fixes the current sympy, using pretty much the same
architecture.
I don't find that a very convincing argument (which is not saying you
are wrong, of course). Given a specific problem everyone (given enough
time, energy, and general cleverness) can come up with a nice and clean
solution that is also fast. The problem with comparing this to current
sympy is that current sympy does *a lot* more. E.g. all of the core
classes (Mul, Pow etc) treat orders, non-commutative symbols, etc etc.
Now you may rightly argue that this should not be in core, but I suppose
you do not want to throw it away either...
This is why I think the algebras approach is better: there different
algebras can manage expressions of different complexity. So lots of
things that are in current core and slow us down can just become part of
more specialised algebras. Note also that csympy would/could then become
the "core" algebra, achieving a final synthesis of approaches.
Obviously, it's hard to discuss merits without a proper writeup. The
idea of "several algebras" (Fredrik+Pearu) is new to me. I have been
meditating it quite a bit today, and I hope I can come up with something
coherent to discuss tomorrow morning.
Fredrik+Pearu's approach might be a better approach, looking at things
from a different angle, as Fredrik says, it might not be that
difficult to use. I still think though, that we should first get
assumptions out of the core, and then we can either just use csympy,
or we can switch to Fredrik+Pearu's approach.
Ondrej
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
