On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Aaron Meurer <[email protected]> wrote: > I've made this easer for people who just want to play around with what > it looks like by pushing a demo up to docs.sympy.org. > > Go to http://docs.sympy.org/mathjax/ and navigate to a LaTeX intensive > page (the mpmath function pages are good examples). Then compare > against the same page replacing "mathjax" in the url with "dev". > > You can see on some pages there are errors (yellow boxes). For > example, at http://docs.sympy.org/mathjax/modules/galgebra/GA/GAsympy.html. > This is because they are somehow defining custom control sequences. > I haven't figured out how to make these work with MathJax yet. I want > to see if people like this idea before I try anything further. > > By the way, the built mathjax docs are 7.3 MB, whereas the built docs > using the current method are 13 MB.
For my book, where I use *tons* of math in sphinx: http://theoretical-physics.net/ I also tried mathjax, but some of the pages take forever to load. So I decided to stick with latex, which is not ideal, but is very robust and renders fast. SymPy docs don't contain nearly as much math as theoretical-physics.net, so I think we can try to use mathjax, and if it turns out that the experience is worse, we can always revert it back to latex. So I would give it a shot. Ondrej -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
