This is read to review at https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/491.
If someone here could review the branch, that would be great, so I can start the release cycle (I want this to be in the release, and I would like to get a release candidate out tomorrow). Aaron Meurer On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Aaron Meurer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Ondrej Certik <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Aaron Meurer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I've made this easer for people who just want to play around with what >>> it looks like by pushing a demo up to docs.sympy.org. >>> >>> Go to http://docs.sympy.org/mathjax/ and navigate to a LaTeX intensive >>> page (the mpmath function pages are good examples). Then compare >>> against the same page replacing "mathjax" in the url with "dev". >>> >>> You can see on some pages there are errors (yellow boxes). For >>> example, at http://docs.sympy.org/mathjax/modules/galgebra/GA/GAsympy.html. >>> This is because they are somehow defining custom control sequences. >>> I haven't figured out how to make these work with MathJax yet. I want >>> to see if people like this idea before I try anything further. >>> >>> By the way, the built mathjax docs are 7.3 MB, whereas the built docs >>> using the current method are 13 MB. >> >> For my book, where I use *tons* of math in sphinx: >> >> http://theoretical-physics.net/ >> >> I also tried mathjax, but some of the pages take forever to load. So I >> decided to stick with latex, which is not ideal, but is very robust >> and renders fast. >> >> SymPy docs don't contain nearly as much math as >> theoretical-physics.net, so I think we can try to use mathjax, and if >> it turns out that the experience is worse, we can always revert it >> back to latex. So I would give it a shot. >> >> Ondrej > > Some of the pages do. I've tested it with some of the pages from Tom's > gsoc branch which contain a lot of math, and it has worked fine. The > benefit is that the build time is *way* faster, and you also save a > ton of disk space by not having LaTeX images (even our docs were half > the size, and that's just with math mainly in the mpmath docs). > > And of course, the MathJax math looks way nicer. > > Aaron Meurer > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
