Great! I don't suppose there were any videos. I don't quite understand the graph on that slide. What does the x-axis (individual committer) mean? From what I understand, he took the commiters from each project and ordered them by number of commits since Jan 1010, and then plotted these, in order. Is that right? If so, then indeed SymPy seems to be doing very well among the top open source scientific Python projects.
Also, I want to say that I completely agree with his statement, "the language lured me in, but I stayed for the community." Aaron Meurer On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Mateusz Paprocki <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > at the end of August I participated in EuroSciPy conference, but > unfortunately didn't have time to follow up. I presented a poster: "Review > of Python-based symbolic mathematics systems and libraries" > (see http://code.google.com/p/sympy/wiki/SymPyPresentations). There were > very many great talks, but I strongly recommend keynote talk due to Fernando > Perez: "Ten years of (interactive) scientific Python" > (http://www.euroscipy.org/file/6459?vid=download). From the perspective of > our community, slide #61 may be the most interesting, because it shows that > (quoting the author) "SymPy is a healthy project". > Mateusz > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
