On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Mateusz Paprocki <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 28 September 2011 08:41, Aaron Meurer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Great!  I don't suppose there were any videos.
>
> This is a "budget" conference, so no videos.
>>
>> I don't quite understand the graph on that slide.  What does the
>> x-axis (individual committer) mean?  From what I understand, he took
>> the commiters from each project and ordered them by number of commits
>> since Jan 1010, and then plotted these, in order.  Is that right?  If
>> so, then indeed SymPy seems to be doing very well among the top open
>> source scientific Python projects.
>
> Yes, on x-axis there are committers and on y-axis number of commits per
> committer during 18 month period of time. So compared to other projects,
> SymPy had, during that period of time, quite a few active developers besides
> core developers (x in [5, 15] is the most interesting, but the whole "tail"
> looks very good).

I see.  So he did something like git shortlog -ns --since="Jan 2010"
(except that doesn't match the graph, so there's also probably a
--before that should be added), and then removed the names and plotted
the numbers against 1, 2, 3, ....

I think I would have gone with lines added/deleted instead of number
of commits, but still, I think you would see the same patterns.

Aaron Meurer

>
>>
>> Also, I want to say that I completely agree with his statement, "the
>> language lured me in, but I stayed for the community."
>>
>> Aaron Meurer
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Mateusz Paprocki <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > at the end of August I participated in EuroSciPy conference, but
>> > unfortunately didn't have time to follow up. I presented a poster:
>> > "Review
>> > of Python-based symbolic mathematics systems and libraries"
>> > (see http://code.google.com/p/sympy/wiki/SymPyPresentations). There were
>> > very many great talks, but I strongly recommend keynote talk due to
>> > Fernando
>> > Perez: "Ten years of (interactive) scientific Python"
>> > (http://www.euroscipy.org/file/6459?vid=download). From the perspective
>> > of
>> > our community, slide #61 may be the most interesting, because it shows
>> > that
>> > (quoting the author) "SymPy is a healthy project".
>> > Mateusz
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups
>> > "sympy" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > [email protected].
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
>> >
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "sympy" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
>>
>
> Mateusz
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sympy" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.

Reply via email to