Any thoughts on this? Should I include rewriting the pyglet module with this?
Thanks, Bharath M R On Wednesday, March 21, 2012 10:47:39 AM UTC+5:30, Bharath M R wrote: > > I went with svgfig because the plots in svgfig look more > of publication quality than google chart API. Google chart API > is better for plotting statistics rather than functions/expressions. > I can also add a backend for google chart api. > > The major part of writing the backend would be integrating Krastonov's > experimental_lambdify with lambdify. Once we have experimental_lambdify, > I think its pretty easy to write a backend for any plotting module. > > I was going through the the mailing list and I found the suggestion by > Krastonov of having a separate lambdify_numeric(experimental_lambdify) > for plotting pretty good. Should we try to make lambdify and > experimental_lambdify > a single function? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sympy/-/pg-vXaV39GEJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
