The best thing about merging is this: I don't even have to try to
understand your history there. It doesn't matter what it is; if you
always merge, you will *never* end up with duplicate commits.

You also don't even really have to think about commit graphs. If you
have a branch A and and you want it to contain content from branch B,
then merge B into A.

Aaron Meurer

On Jun 16, 2012, at 3:24 PM, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]> wrote:

> I think that this is a good example:
> https://gist.github.com/2942535
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "sympy" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.

Reply via email to