On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 2:13 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: >> Can you post your script? If it already implements the above, that >> would of course be great! >> I didn't know about it. > > I have posted a version of it some time ago as a pull request: > https://github.com/sympy/sympy-bot/pull/74 > > The current version is a bit more robust, however this is only a > **throwaway script**. > > It downloads the PR webpage, checks in the comments whether an > up-to-date test was already ran and if not it starts sympy-bot. The > current version rearranged a bit the control flow, because the one in > the PR74 was prone to redo unnecessary tests. > > If it is decided that sympy-bot really needs beefing-up I advise > against using this script.
I think it works well. Would you mind posting your current script? So that I can set it up on my server as well. I think that your sympy-bot installation is using randomized hashes, right? It's important to have one such set of tests to discover the hash() bugs. However, given that such bugs are already in sympy, it is also equally important to have some tests that simply use some hash/platform combination which works (for example the one at Travis CI works), so that we can quickly determine whether the given pull request breaks anything. I just donated $70 to Travis CI for sympy, so they will probably enable the pull request testing soon. Ondrej -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
