On Jun 24, 2012, at 4:06 PM, "Ondřej Čertík" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 2:56 PM, [email protected] > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I think it works well. Would you mind posting your current script? >>> So that I can set it up on my server as well. >> OK, however it will not do much good - what is tested by your server >> will not be tested by mine and vice-versa. So running it on two >> machines would be useful only if there are too many pull requests to >> be tested. >> >> https://gist.github.com/2985162 > > I'll try to provide a better implementation of the > really_ugly_solution_for_finding_the_last_test_sha() > function to only take into account comments produced by you (or me). > Then there will be no clashes, > as long as both you and me use the new version. How will this scale? I will also have spare machines to dedicate to this, once I get my new laptop. I think the idea behind sympy-bot work is that the app-engine server would keep track of what needs to be tested and distribute the work so that there is no duplication. Aaron Meurer > >> >>> I think that your sympy-bot installation is using >>> randomized hashes, right? It's important to have one such set of tests >>> to discover the hash() bugs. >> It is using randomized hashes because the test runner uses them by >> default (since yesterday, thanks to a pull request done by Aaron). >> >> In detail: >> - python2.5, 32bit, without additional installed modules, without hash >> randomization because it is not supported in 2.5 >> - python2.7.3, 64bit, with numpy, gmpy, matplotlib, with hash randomization >> - python3.2.3, 64bit, without additional installed modules, with hash >> randomization > > This is very good. Yes. > >> >> So we have both tests with and without hash randomization at the >> moment on both architectures. >> Off topic: Just because of how silly it would be I would also start >> testing on a RasberyPie ARM processor when I receive it in a month or >> two. > > :) > >> >>> I just donated $70 to Travis CI for sympy, so they will probably >>> enable the pull request testing >>> soon. >> >> This is great. Is there actually a way to donate to sympy in order to >> pay for stuff like this. > > Aaron and I are setting it up through http://numfocus.org/. > Eventually we'll have a donate button on the webpage. > > Ondrej > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
