Pallab, On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Aaron Meurer <[email protected]> wrote: > It's present status is mostly stalled. You can see some stuff at > https://github.com/certik/sympyx.
Yes, that's a Cythonized core, the speed is decent (e.g. sometimes faster than Sage, sometimes slower depending on the benchmark). > > The problem is that the core is currently (and has been for some time) > a mess, mostly due to the old assumptions, making it hard to do things > with. Yes, we need to eventually fix that. > > Ondrej might be able to comment more on any progress or planned progress. The work below is very preliminary: My nearest plan is to figure out whether one can write a faster (than sympyx) core in C++, my latest code is here (in the "w" branch) https://github.com/certik/csympy/tree/w I am using better data structures and quite simple/maintainable model, I am quite close to actually be able to run some benchmarks. Then depending on those, I will think about the overall strategy, and we'll see how to proceed from there. But as I said, this is really just preliminary -- it might, or might not be a viable option. Let me know if you (or anyone) want to help out. Ondrej -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
