On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Vinzent Steinberg <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:09:17 PM UTC+2, Ondřej Čertík wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 3:40 AM, pallab wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > I would like to help. Please let me know how I can help. Although my >> > help >> > may not be very effective :) >> >> Right now you can help by sending pull requests against: >> >> https://github.com/certik/csympy/tree/w >> >> (i.e. the "w" branch) that improve the code so that we can run >> benchmarks from here: >> >> https://github.com/certik/sympyx/blob/master/benchmarks.py >> >> we'll stay on the C++ level, so that we don't have to bother with >> Python wrappers (for now). >> It might be too difficult to help out with this at this stage, I don't >> know. I wanted to ask for help >> later, but since you asked, I figured out why not to let you know early. > > > How does this compare to GiNaC? [1]
It's very similar. The difference is that I use RCP from Trilinos and C++11 datastructures (unordered_map), and I want to see how fast one can get. GiNaC will be one obvious library to compare against. There is also PyNaC [2], which Sage uses, but for some reason, it's a bit slower in Sage. So my first benchmarks will be against GiNaC in C++. That's pretty much the fastest that I know of, in open source. Ondrej [2] https://bitbucket.org/burcin/pynac -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
