On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Ondřej Čertík <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Aaron Meurer <[email protected]> wrote:
>> IMHO, rebasing has too high of a potential of making the history not
>> make sense even if you don't squash, because of the way that changes
>> can be "rebased out" of commits.  So I would recommend not rebasing at
>> all, if it's not necessary.
>
> Are you talking about rebasing in the step 1), or step 4) or step 6)?
> Are you suggesting to use "merge" only (if there are conflicts)?

I guess the step 1 rebase is OK, because that's when you actually
split up the commits.  I personally don't do it that way, but I think
it works. But otherwise, I would avoid it.

Actually, I guess the big thing is rebasing over master.  If you just
rebase over a commit that's already i your branch, it shouldn't happen
there either (but again, it's usually not necessary).

>
>>
>> I definitely agree that it's a good idea to start a PR as soon as you
>> have a single commit, so that people can start to review it and test
>> it as you work.  You can just say "work in progress" or "not ready to
>> merge" in the OP if it needs to wait for all the commits, and then
>> remove it when it's done.
>
> I think it's becoming standard to use [WIP] as the first thing in the
> title of the pull request,
> I've seen it couple times in other projects (wip = work in progress). That way
> you can easily see it and not even click on the pull request unless
> you are interested.
>
> Ondrej
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "sympy" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.

Reply via email to