Actually, I just realized that even that output can be made more compact. How do people feel about something like https://github.com/sympy/sympy-bot/pull/123#issuecomment-7600885 ?
Aaron Meurer On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Aaron Meurer <[email protected]> wrote: > That is exactly the goal of my pull request at > https://github.com/sympy/sympy-bot/pull/123. I've given an example of > a before and after: > https://github.com/sympy/sympy-bot/pull/123#issuecomment-7475278. > > Perhaps we should upload even that info to the reviews site, and only > actually post one line on the PR as you suggest. That would be a > little bit more work, though (I'm personally not up to it right now, > but patches welcome). > > Aaron Meurer > > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Jason Moore <[email protected]> wrote: >> What about reducing the length of the SymPy bot's post in the conversation >> on the PR? I think the travisbot is a one liner. The test results can be >> found by click the link in the one line. >> >> Example >> >> SymPy bot test fails 32 tests, [details are here]. >> >> Jason >> >> >> On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 3:02:49 PM UTC-7, Aaron Meurer wrote: >>> >>> I actually think that the bots are useful for these. It's basically >>> free test running for your code, meaning you can find and fix bugs >>> sooner in the development process. >>> >>> Aaron Meurer >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Jason Moore <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > I like the work in progress idea (WIP). The github pull request >>> > conversation >>> > view is a really nice way to talk about code with someone, regardless if >>> > it >>> > is ready to be merged into the stable branch or not. Github's internal >>> > workflow uses a pull early model: >>> > http://scottchacon.com/2011/08/31/github-flow.html . It would be nice if >>> > we >>> > could turn off the bots for WIP (early pulls) so that they don't clutter >>> > the >>> > conversation. Is that possible? Who is controlling the bots, or is it >>> > all >>> > automated? The bots stress me out when the pull request is young and >>> > still >>> > needs a lot of work and they don't provide that much useful information. >>> > >>> > Jason >>> > >>> > >>> > On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 2:23:38 AM UTC-7, smichr wrote: >>> >> >>> >> I only ever rebase, and the only thing I have to watch out for is to >>> >> not extend acbk into master's commits, e.g. `git rebase -i head~5` to >>> >> work with the last 5 commits *of mine*. If the 6th one is a merge that >>> >> is part of master then that can be really nasty (it shows up as there >>> >> being more than 6 commits that you are working with in the editor -- >>> >> that's how I know if I made a counting error). >>> > >>> > -- >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> > Groups >>> > "sympy" group. >>> > To view this discussion on the web visit >>> > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sympy/-/1PcG3Mh2hQUJ. >>> > >>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> > [email protected]. >>> > For more options, visit this group at >>> > http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "sympy" group. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sympy/-/_WSxjcria2IJ. >> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
