On Feb 14, 2013, at 8:10 AM, David Mashburn <[email protected]> wrote:
> You might be thinking of something like http://arachnoid.com/latex/ that uses > MathJax. > > If you haven't seen it before, you should also check out MathQuill > (http://mathquill.com/). It really does a surprisingly good job of > manipulating 2d mathematical expressions in a WYSIWYG way. This was the one. Imagine this, except you are typing SymPy code instead of LaTeX. > > In a perfect world, I would love to see 2-way mappings between 2D structured > input, some subset or variation of sympy code, and a subset of TeX... with a > rendering smart enough (and fast enough) to render any of the three on the > fly while editing any one of them... I can dream can't I? I think we just need to refactor our printer to be a little more general. Right now, it just builds the string as it goes and returns it. Instead, it should build an object that represents both the string and the "string expression tree," if you will. This contains information about how the various string objects are placed relative to one another. Then one just has to build an interface on top of that. Aaron Meurer > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
