@somebody, I have to agree with you. I just favoured R3 because MOST of my work, as of my current concept, would revolve around R3. However, if Rn is decided as the default case, it wouldnt be much of a hassle for me or Prasoon to change our implementation accordingly. As I pointed out, its for the sympy.physics people to decide. About the proposal, I want to study parts of the Reference book I mentioned on the thread of my proposal, before I put up my concrete proposal on the wiki. I will do that most probably by the first week of April. From what the current situation seems to be, Prasoon and I would have to coordinate our efforts about quite a few aspects of vector field handling and discuss the implementations before GSOC begins. We have started corresponding for the same, and we hope to have a good, solid idea about the entire module as a whole by mid-April. If you guys have any inputs/ ideas, we would like them to discuss them and incorporate them in our proposals by that time. Also, I want to know what you guys think about the CoordinateFrame concept to 'extend' the idea of ReferenceFrame.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
