Alright then, I'll make one in a few hours. On Tuesday, June 4, 2013 2:46:22 AM UTC+5:30, Stefan Krastanov wrote: > > Today we had the first discussion with Prasoon and Sachin about their > projects. > > We did not progress much but at least we outlined the two general > approaches that we can use for these modules (specifically for creating > vector fields). I will give them somewhat arbitrary names here: > > - the `mechanics` way - having a Vector class that keeps all the > information about the field and it is not part of expression trees in the > way Basic and Expr are. For instance Vector(something along > cartesian.x)+Vector(something along spherical.r) will result in > Vector(complex internal structure). > > - the `diffgeom` way - having base/unit vectors and building all the rest > in terms of their linear combinations (all this expressed as sympy > expressions). > > > > Prasoon and Sachin did not have the time to look at the example problem > that was given in the previous email yet (no harm done there, there is > still some time before the official starting date). Probably this will be > the subject of our next discussion. > > The next discussion was scheduled for tomorrow. After that I suggest that > we keep most of the discussions to the mailing list and the gihub wiki and > meet on irc / realtime wikis / google docs / etc once a week. > > Stefan >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
