Yes, That's fine with me too. Thanks for the reply Ondrej. Regards, Thilina
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Ondřej Čertík <[email protected]>wrote: > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Thilina Rathnayake > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > There were few notes about it in the paper and I am pretty sure > > I can find some references for it. If that is the case, is this kind of a > > representation good? > > Yes, I think the [(220, 61), (40, 11), (768, 213), (12, 3)] > representation is very good. > > Then your other function takes this and returns the general solution > in terms of "n", once you implement it. > > Ondrej > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
