I just checked evalf and it returns the right answers, inf and -inf.
So apparently it's smarter than I had thought.

Aaron Meurer

On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:04 AM, Sergey Kirpichev <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 7:13:09 AM UTC+4, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>>
>> evalf won't help
>> either: it's use is for numerical evaluation, but numerical inf
>> behaves the same way.
>
>
> Are you sure that evalf isn't broken here?
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sympy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to