My thoughts on what's written so far are different from Ondrej's.  I am
less excited by physics applications and more excited by the tools
necessary to enable the expression of physics applications.  The extent to
which a domain specific project like this can be broken into a generally
applicable component (some mathy or algorithmic bit) and a domain specific
application (some physics thing) is good.  This increases the applicability
and relevance of a summer project to a wider audience.


On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Ondřej Čertík <[email protected]>wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Ondřej Čertík <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > I read through your ideas. First of all, I started SymPy as a
> > theoretical physics student myself,
> > and I wanted to automate the General Relativity as well as high energy
> > QFT calculations. I am still
> > very interested in that, but there are a lot of tough problems and
> > parts that need to be in place.
> >
> > You need to be able to do integrals, handle potentially large
> > formulas, tensor manipulation and simplification
> > (e.g. gamma matrices), and so on. It's not easy at all, but we've done
> > a long progress since the time I started
> > SymPy in 2007 or so. Most of these things are in place, in some form.
> > In order to efficiently handle very large
> > expressions, I started developing CSymPy about half a year ago
> > (https://github.com/certik/csympy), this
> > will come very handy as well for these applications.
> >
> > The best way to get some ideas of what can be done is to look into
> > existing packages, they are pretty much
> > all in Mathematica. In fact, most theoretical physicist just use
> > Mathematica. And let's be frank, it's currently the
> > best if you just care about getting the results. There is also GiNaC
> > (http://www.ginac.de/) that can be used for some of the
> > high energy stuff, but CSymPy can now do pretty similar things,
> > sometimes faster. So there is:
> >
> > http://www.feyncalc.org/
> >
> > there are all these various things people wrote for Mathematica:
> >
> > @article{huber2012crasydse,
> >   title={CrasyDSE: A framework for solving Dyson--Schwinger equations},
> >   author={Huber, Markus Q and Mitter, Mario},
> >   journal={Computer Physics Communications},
> >   volume={183},
> >   number={11},
> >   pages={2441--2457},
> >   year={2012},
> >   publisher={Elsevier}
> > }
> >
> > @article{huber2012algorithmic,
> >   title={Algorithmic derivation of functional renormalization group
> > equations and Dyson--Schwinger equations},
> >   author={Huber, Markus Q and Braun, Jens},
> >   journal={Computer Physics Communications},
> >   volume={183},
> >   number={6},
> >   pages={1290--1320},
> >   year={2012},
> >   publisher={Elsevier}
> > }
> >
> > But the advantage of SymPy is that the whole stack is opensource, and
> > SymPy is just a library, so it better integrates
> > with things like IPython Notebook and you can create the whole
> > application in it. For example, the physics.quantum
> > module has some good stuff, that plays together much better than
> > packages in Mathematica. Another great application is PyDy.
> >
> > So it would be really nice to have the project that you describe. You
> > should have a look at work done by Francesco Bonazzi
> > regarding the gamma matrices:
> >
> > https://github.com/Upabjojr
> > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2601
> >
> > He has lots of PRs, closed and open. It's nontrivial. And those are
> > just the gamma matrices. I think Francesco's goal
> > could be summarized by your proposal, and he's done many months worth
> > of work on it already. So the scope is just huge.
> > So there is plenty of things that could be done for the summer.
> >
> > One of the things is for example just the Feynman diagrams generator
> > for various Lagrangians. I am sure there must be some
> > packages that do that, but it'd be nice to integrate this with SymPy
> > and create nice IPython Notebooks that generate all the correct
> > diagrams, for example from Peskin & Schroeder. This will be good for
>
> I.e. this would involve some classes for representation of Feynman
> diagrams,
> that would also know how to nicely visualize themselves in the IPython
> Notebook,
> and then code that generates them for various interactions.
> And so on.
>
> For other ideas, I have some derivations of various things here:
>
> http://theoretical-physics.net/dev/src/quantum/qft.html#standard-model
>
> that could be automated. For example one can reformulate the problem using
> Green's functions and so on.
>
> Ondrej
>
> > pedagogical reasons, as well as computations. In general,
> > good applications in my opinion are providing automatic symbolic
> > solutions to various exercises from books.
> >
> > Another thing is of course Regularization and Renormalization.
> >
> > I would suggest you to figure out something, that can be finished
> > during a summer and that would provide something useful,
> > on it's own. So that you can create nice examples out of it. Then you
> > can continue working on some other things after the summer.
> >
> > Ondrej
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sympy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CADDwiVCdh9JHMZ%3DQeUMK1-xrcXhjOY4JraWcs5OmnrzsJnZRZg%40mail.gmail.com
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CAJ8oX-EyLMkyEpgbqdbEvx5X6Y4ar96W0r6EzfELmZF18J_7UA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to