On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Stefan Krastanov
<[email protected]> wrote:
> @Matthew, in general I would agree, but the algorithms for translating
> "Lagrangian -> Feynman rules" or "Feynman rules + initial and final
> state -> differential cross section" are already both 1) non trivial
> and 2) domain specific. Abstracting this away might not be worth it as
> it is not really used anywhere else.
>
> (but where it is used, it is used a lot. There is an entire standard
> around it (UFO model files and Les Houches dump files as described in
> the FeynRules and MadGraph projects))

Exactly.

It would be good to have this in sympy. This would stress various
symbolic features a lot, and I think it would also be used a lot.

>
> Exception: It might be useful in calculating correlations of some
> multivariate functions through series expansions. That might we worth
> investigating somewhat more.

Ondrej

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CADDwiVD81S98mGQyuU3%2B9EO_m14so3kA0JSm4i2e%3D7Vy%2BNNKMQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to