On Wednesday, September 3, 2014 6:44:06 AM UTC+4, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > I think such situations are OK, as long as you understand why the test > failed before and verified that the new test really tests the same > thing. >
1. We can make mistakes here. 2. Probably, we want to be sure, that we never break again the fixed example (incl. by different reason). How we can be sure about this, if we don't preserve the original test? > I noticed that the slow test was taking about 2 minutes. Can't we exclude slow tests with some cli switch? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/49cad101-0f4a-4f99-b300-7b2549250f59%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
