Am 03.09.2014 um 21:07 schrieb Sergey Kirpichev:
On Wednesday, September 3, 2014 6:44:06 AM UTC+4, Aaron Meurer wrote:
I think such situations are OK, as long as you understand why the test
failed before and verified that the new test really tests the same
thing.
1. We can make mistakes here.
2. Probably, we want to be sure, that we never break again the
fixed example (incl. by different reason). How we can be sure about
this, if we don't preserve the original test?
I noticed that the slow test was taking about 2 minutes.
Can't we exclude slow tests with some cli switch?
What good is a unit test that is excluded?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/540787A8.6030701%40durchholz.org.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
