On Tuesday, 16 February 2016 23:59:56 UTC+1, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > Take for instance the googolplex, 10**10**100. You can represent this > already > using Pow(10, Pow(10, 100, evaluate=False), evaluate=False). But there > are two issues with this. First is that evaluate=False is very > fragile. Any function that tries to rebuild the expression will cause > it to evaluate. >
What about introducing a persistent container for unevaluated objects? It would define *.func( )* so as to never evaluate its contained expression. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sympy. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/a3ef333b-5b0a-4d0b-96fb-597b8ae14fc0%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
